Tull is in the air. Weird. A couple of run-ins with Tull have got me to cooking the noggin over them lately. To what end (probably won’t find it here) I’m not sure … yet.
Just this past Friday I helped to wo/man the WRIR table at the First Fridays Artwalk here in Richmond. First off, it was a blast. Lots going on. I was chatting with another WRIR bloke about music, etc … We quickly realized we had quite a bit in common and, of course, the conversation turned to Hawkwind. Which turned to Robert Calvert. Which turned to Gong. You get the picture I’m sure. Eventually, the ship touched down at Jethro Tull. Another fine gentleman walking by was introduced and we quickly found out about his love of Tull.
And off we went. Lots of good talk over Tull, which is kind of rare. At least for me.
One digression led us fogies to what is cool vs. uncool. Needless to say, we were lost in the woods. Or at least I was and I wasn’t going to let on so easily, though my transparency is pretty evident. In a half-assed attempt to show pithy insight I offered what I thought most people out and about on this gorgeous night would think is uncool:
“Three old spaceheads standing around talking about Tull. That’s uncool.”
Then I was chit-chatting with another friend about all this Beatles hoopla that’s sending out static everywhere. In one of our pledges of fealty to the Beatles it came up that lyrics were used in the program or invite or something printed (remember that trade, kids?) for their big day. So, I coughed up:
“Well, my bride walked in to a Jethro Tull song (note: “Wond’ring Aloud” if you are wont to wond’ring) …”
Wow. Tull again on the horizon in such a brief time.
Then I ended up re-reading Lester Bang’s piece about, you got it, “Jethro Tull in Vietnam.”
All this going on while I’ve been revisiting Tull’s unfairly maligned “Under Wraps.”
Huh, soundtrack by Jethro Tull.
Wow squared. That’s a lot of Tull in my ether.
But I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. Jethro Tull has a long running thread in my little continuum. I love Tull. Even when they have stumbled (not much really. REALLY). I’m not sure what it was about them that got me stop my then banging head and prick up my ears. I’m sure much of it started with their intrinsic theatricality. That’s a big lure for a puppy. Though that aspect kind of waned for me, and them, it was big foot in the door. For some reason I bought it from them. And not many others really … Hand in hand, I was born on the wrong side of Tull. All the older kids I grew up with were into them. And since those kids occupied some sort of pantheon for me (OK, they still do …), Tull was put up there on a pedestal with them. There I go again: inordinate time devoted to cultivating some warped little personal mythology over a band that just draws them in closer and closer to my heart. And Tull were so oddball compared to so much other stuff filtering in I just HAD to get into them. I’ll show them, dammit … hand it here, pal, I’ll wave that flag …
As I got older and the astral planes got wider and wider and wider, I grew to relish their craftsmanship over the showmanship. Those guys could really play! And, still today, I don’t have a problem with folks who know their instruments inside and out. There’s nothing wrong with being good. That’s no obstacle to firing it up nor does it preclude a band from having credibility, or chops … or, unlike Tull, being simple and economical and still pumping out an ass-kicking song or 20.
Tull is around. You can’t get away from them, nor can you (my apologies to some of you ) erase them from the history books anymore than you can erase their name scrawled in black Sharpie on one of my blue canvas covered 3-ring binders.
I remember very recently when the Decemberists new disc dropped (I’ll be upfront: I don’t care much for the Decemberists. I had some passed to me. And I tried numerous times, but … no hook on that line for me. No disrespect to the band at all) hearing Tull’s name bandied about in reviews and blips on the radar. One specifically referenced some strong similarities to “Thick as a Brick.” Wow. What did I miss? I went back in to find out. Nothing there for me again. Anyway, back on point (there probably isn’t one) … I thought it was very cool that a relatively “new” band was eliciting comparisons to Tull, a band dismissed by many as merely ostentatious and vacuous underneath all that glockenspiel. Good for the Decemberists. Good for Tull. Everybody wins. I may not care for the Decemberists but they seem like literate, savvy, knowledgeable guys. Guys who might appreciate Tull beyond acting like crows who just like to pick up shiny things and bury them in their music, then coat it with a fattening helping of irony and serve it to you with an infuriating hipster in-the-know wink of their jaundiced eye. It’s all coming down the same pipeline, no need to deny it. If you like it, wave your freak flag. That’s what it’s all about. That’s being a good citizen is in my book.
OK, under wraps. I think it’s a testament to the band, any band, that’s been relegated to dinosaur status (whatever that really is) that their name is invoked to draw similarities to, and give accolades to, a band that came much later and is in the sun right now, having their 15 minutes of eclipsing some of their peers. That not only gives the young turks a greater definition to us listeners, but puts it all right back into one big slipstream for us to ride on. And more importantly, to get out there and explore … whether your headed one-way back to Tull, or going the other to the Decemberists.
I think that’s cool.
{ … Motörhead was pretty cool last night, too … }